From: | Jurek Bartuszek <jurek@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | ||
Date: | Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:49:53 | ||
Message-Id: | 462E6CC4.5000408@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Danny van Dyk |
1 | > Only a short response, as I'm a bit in a hurry right now. From |
2 | > #gentoo-council earlier: |
3 | > |
4 | > 18:25 <@robbat2> make him covert it to "_rc%04d%04d%02d%02d",$RC,$YEAR, |
5 | > $MONTH,$DAY |
6 | |
7 | Let me see if I have this straight: suppose we have package foo-0.1_rc2 |
8 | released (very outdated) and we're waiting for foo-0.1_rc3. Then example |
9 | of something between those two would be foo-0.1_rc000220070313? Would |
10 | that force portage to update to this version? Wouldn't that prevent |
11 | portage from enforcing update to _rc3 when it's delivered? Of course I |
12 | might be wrong and if this is the case then excuse me for the whole fuss ;) |
13 | |
14 | Best regards, |
15 | Jurek |
16 | -- |
17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | "Piotr JaroszyĆski" <peper@g.o> |