Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jurek Bartuszek <jurek@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:49:53
Message-Id: 462E6CC4.5000408@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Danny van Dyk
1 > Only a short response, as I'm a bit in a hurry right now. From
2 > #gentoo-council earlier:
3 >
4 > 18:25 <@robbat2> make him covert it to "_rc%04d%04d%02d%02d",$RC,$YEAR,
5 > $MONTH,$DAY
6
7 Let me see if I have this straight: suppose we have package foo-0.1_rc2
8 released (very outdated) and we're waiting for foo-0.1_rc3. Then example
9 of something between those two would be foo-0.1_rc000220070313? Would
10 that force portage to update to this version? Wouldn't that prevent
11 portage from enforcing update to _rc3 when it's delivered? Of course I
12 might be wrong and if this is the case then excuse me for the whole fuss ;)
13
14 Best regards,
15 Jurek
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies