Archives
Archives
| From: | "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:28:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200704242320.05879.peper@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Jurek Bartuszek |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 24 of April 2007 22:47:00 Jurek Bartuszek wrote: |
| 2 | > Let me see if I have this straight: suppose we have package foo-0.1_rc2 |
| 3 | > released (very outdated) and we're waiting for foo-0.1_rc3. Then example |
| 4 | > of something between those two would be foo-0.1_rc000220070313? Would |
| 5 | > that force portage to update to this version? Wouldn't that prevent |
| 6 | > portage from enforcing update to _rc3 when it's delivered? Of course I |
| 7 | > might be wrong and if this is the case then excuse me for the whole fuss ;) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | foo-0.1_rc2 < foo-0.1_rc000220070313 < foo-0.1_rc3 |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Best Regards, |
| 13 | Piotr Jaroszyñski |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |