Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:46:16
Message-Id: 20070424234130.864ea26c.genone@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by "Piotr Jaroszyński"
1 On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:20:05 +0200
2 Piotr Jaroszyński <peper@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Tuesday 24 of April 2007 22:47:00 Jurek Bartuszek wrote:
5 > > Let me see if I have this straight: suppose we have package foo-0.1_rc2
6 > > released (very outdated) and we're waiting for foo-0.1_rc3. Then example
7 > > of something between those two would be foo-0.1_rc000220070313? Would
8 > > that force portage to update to this version? Wouldn't that prevent
9 > > portage from enforcing update to _rc3 when it's delivered? Of course I
10 > > might be wrong and if this is the case then excuse me for the whole fuss ;)
11 >
12 > foo-0.1_rc2 < foo-0.1_rc000220070313 < foo-0.1_rc3
13
14 Nope. The number part of suffixes is compared as integer.
15
16 Marius
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list