| 1 |
El dom, 18-11-2012 a las 11:13 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 18/11/12 07:19, Greg KH wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:00:52AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Having a builtin is a good idea, but the implementation as a mandatory |
| 5 |
> >> dependency on kmod is not. The plan is to reintroduce it as an optional |
| 6 |
> >> dependency, so that distributions (and Gentoo users) that do not want it |
| 7 |
> >> can avoid it. None of us want to force dependencies on others and there |
| 8 |
> >> is no need for this one. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > You do realize that you didn't really drop the dependency at all, right? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Exactly what I had in mind. So far I see bunch of regressions (back to |
| 13 |
> bundling code :() in the "eudev" repository and more it deviates from |
| 14 |
> the orig. upstream the less attractive it's looking... |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> What should be done, at most, is to cherry-pick and revert the things |
| 17 |
> that killed the sep. /usr support, put it behind an USE flag to the |
| 18 |
> current udev's ebuild, perhaps IUSE="+vanilla", and be done with it. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> - Samuli |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+1 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
@eudev maintainers, Wouldn't that be possible? |
Archives