1 |
Michael Palimaka wrote: |
2 |
> The 30 day waiting period is useful for smoking out major upstream bugs, |
3 |
> but can't replace stabilisation integration testing. For example, |
4 |
> package foobar may build fine in ~arch but fails in stable because it |
5 |
> needs a newer libbaz. |
6 |
|
7 |
So that's either because of an ebuild bug (incorrect DEPEND) or an |
8 |
upstream bug (e.g. incorrect PKG_CONFIG_CHECK in configure.ac), right? |
9 |
|
10 |
It seems to me that waiting (random()=30) days and then testing |
11 |
against (random()=current-version) libbaz in stable isn't amazing. :) |
12 |
|
13 |
The ebuild bug could be detected automatically for upstreams using |
14 |
configure.ac and maybe also cmake. |
15 |
|
16 |
The upstream bug, well, that's a bit more tricky. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
I'll try to write a thoughtful response in the other part of this |
20 |
thread later. Gotta run now. Thanks everyone for your insights! |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
//Peter |