| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 5 |
> So until we have a decision on what the replacement will be I |
| 6 |
> don't see a need to remove current prepalldocs usage but any new usage |
| 7 |
> must be avoided. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
If it's simply discouraged, perhaps a repoman check, and some people to |
| 10 |
come forward with a better suggestion is all that's necessary? Once the |
| 11 |
new system's in place the repoman check can be made fatal, and suggest |
| 12 |
the new mechanism. That would save endless "do/don't" conversations on |
| 13 |
- -dev. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
It might also be worthwhile the council posting another official mail |
| 16 |
clarifying the position, so that we can all get on with our lives. |
| 17 |
Those that don't agree with the council can take the normal steps to |
| 18 |
bring their disagreement to their attention... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Mike 5:) |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkmcaWIACgkQu7rWomwgFXomBACeLkFewJjIieT0oA5uMcSWbJyO |
| 25 |
dO4AoKhF0PGFz//jWIH1FxhidJ6c9CEx |
| 26 |
=AKtW |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives