| 1 |
Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> said: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> One of the GLEP's primary goals is to provide a global use flag |
| 5 |
>> definition and over-ride |
| 6 |
>> it with a local definition. How does putting all flags in use.desc |
| 7 |
>> and over-riding local flags in |
| 8 |
>> use.local.desc not accomplish this? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> It does, and maybe that's what we should use instead? The reason for |
| 12 |
> the email is to figure out if what we have now is good enough, or if we |
| 13 |
> should switch to something else. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You're the one forcing people to remove overriding USE flags from |
| 18 |
use.local.desc when that's something that people have been doing for |
| 19 |
ages. The current Portage tools support that method. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives