Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for retirement of old gentoo 'versions'
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 01:16:32
Message-Id: 200407042114.30834.absinthe@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for retirement of old gentoo 'versions' by Marius Mauch
1 On Sunday 04 July 2004 6:10 pm, Marius Mauch wrote:
2
3 > I don't think that we want to force specific versions on users.
4 > If we do so they will start to modify the profiles locally which would
5 > be an even worse problem.
6
7 For current releases/profiles, I would agree. For old profiles, I think
8 it's reasonable to restrict packages. It's easier to keep a profile
9 together than it is to support the whole package tree against users who
10 are using a 1.0 profile (or whatever). I'm not sure it's possible for us
11 to adequately QA old profiles -- moving targets. It makes sense (in my
12 way of thinking, anyway) to limit old profiles to things we know that
13 work... things that are thoroughly tested against that profile. While the
14 majority of our manhours happen in the current and future profiles. If
15 people need newer packages, they would consider switching their machines
16 to a newer profile.
17
18 > anyway this needs a GLEP before it could be considered.
19
20 Agreed. I'm not part of the "enterprise" stuff, wherever that currently
21 lives (it's not listed in Projects or Sub-projects, so I have no idea).
22 But I would like to be a reviewer in that process at least, if not a
23 contributor.
24
25 Cheers,
26 Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o]
27 Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list