1 |
On Sunday 04 July 2004 6:10 pm, Marius Mauch wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I don't think that we want to force specific versions on users. |
4 |
> If we do so they will start to modify the profiles locally which would |
5 |
> be an even worse problem. |
6 |
|
7 |
For current releases/profiles, I would agree. For old profiles, I think |
8 |
it's reasonable to restrict packages. It's easier to keep a profile |
9 |
together than it is to support the whole package tree against users who |
10 |
are using a 1.0 profile (or whatever). I'm not sure it's possible for us |
11 |
to adequately QA old profiles -- moving targets. It makes sense (in my |
12 |
way of thinking, anyway) to limit old profiles to things we know that |
13 |
work... things that are thoroughly tested against that profile. While the |
14 |
majority of our manhours happen in the current and future profiles. If |
15 |
people need newer packages, they would consider switching their machines |
16 |
to a newer profile. |
17 |
|
18 |
> anyway this needs a GLEP before it could be considered. |
19 |
|
20 |
Agreed. I'm not part of the "enterprise" stuff, wherever that currently |
21 |
lives (it's not listed in Projects or Sub-projects, so I have no idea). |
22 |
But I would like to be a reviewer in that process at least, if not a |
23 |
contributor. |
24 |
|
25 |
Cheers, |
26 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
27 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |