| 1 |
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:22:16 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> But in comment 4 user ask about updates itself. If we have live |
| 6 |
>> package and revision does not change it is pointless waste of |
| 7 |
>> resources to recompile it usualy. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> * Allowing installed SCM ebuilds to identify the revision with which |
| 10 |
> they were built. This isn't overly difficult, once you get around |
| 11 |
> things like CVS not really having a revision. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
By the way, update-live-ebuilds[1] gets around this by doing sha1sum |
| 14 |
on certain parts of the CVS directory. CVS and TLA are the only |
| 15 |
eclasses which this should be necessary. This, obviously, means a |
| 16 |
update is done first and the hash is figured out afterwards, making it |
| 17 |
rather limiting. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
1. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-725867-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-ule.html |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
avuton |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
| (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny |
| 24 |
| (='.'=) into your signature to help him gain |
| 25 |
| (")_(") world domination. |
Archives