Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>, s390 <s390@g.o>, riscv@g.o, mips <mips@g.o>, multilib <multilib@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo | ||
| Date: | Tue, 07 May 2019 22:04:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38E4KTmHqvVPOFSyqHZJX5ZBqGO1KHpHxHhLVaG4-swJLg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:47 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > On the other hand, if I am consider the benefit of having large number |
| 3 | > of flags that will never benefit the majority of users (if anyone) |
| 4 | > vs. having much faster CI (= being able to run it more frequently, |
| 5 | > and therefore report problems faster), you can guess which way I prefer. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Does mips' multilib support affect CI since all the profiles are 'exp'? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Presumably it's something we'd have to think a lot about if we ever |
| 10 | wanted to promote the mips profiles... |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |