1 |
ons 2001-11-28 klockan 15.56 skrev Joshua Pollak: |
2 |
> Ok, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> First off, I agree calling it issuetracker is a better idea than |
5 |
> bugtracker, because of the desire to handle ebuilds/feature |
6 |
> requests/etc. Also, I definately agree, an easy to use interface is very |
7 |
> important. That's mainly why I don't like bugzilla very much. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I think PEST would be the best system to use, I just came across it |
10 |
> yesterday when searching for bug tracking software. The reasons I |
11 |
> think its a good option are: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> - Good looking, simple interface, should be easy to use |
14 |
|
15 |
In what way is it easier to use than bugzilla? I thought the interface |
16 |
(at least the one in the demo) to be quite ugly and non-intuitive. |
17 |
|
18 |
> So if Thread and chadh would like to contact me about letting me set |
19 |
> something up, that would be cool. If anyone has any |
20 |
> suggestions/comments, let me know. I think I will start in the mean time |
21 |
> by setting up a test installation on my own server to see how hard it is |
22 |
> to install and see what the issues are. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-Josh |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:21:58PM +0100, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: |
29 |
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:22:04 -0500 |
30 |
> > Joshua Pollak <pardsbane@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > > Something along the lines of Bugzilla/SF's features/phpBugTracker, etc, |
33 |
> > > should be fine, right? I could set it up on my own server, or I can set |
34 |
> > > it up somewhere else. If the project is willing to accept the work, once |
35 |
> > > done, I'll get started right away. |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > See if you can't get in contact with chadh on how to set it up on |
38 |
> > cvs.gentoo.org (which perhaps should get a new alias: bugs.gentoo.org ?). |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > We should have at least two modes for the bugtracker: end-user and |
41 |
> > developer. The full-blown bugzilla interface is a bit intimidating for |
42 |
> > first-time end-users, so they should by default get an easy-to-use |
43 |
> > interface. |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> > The regular developers should get the full-blown interface, I guess. |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > The main thing about the bugtracker is that we should _USE_ it. So we'll |
48 |
> > just have to keep tweaking it until everybody uses it for adding ebuilds, |
49 |
> > bug reports, wishes, etc. |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > In fact, we should perhaps rename it from "bugtracker" to "issuetracker", |
52 |
> > since we want to have it handle more than just bugs: we want all new |
53 |
> > ebuilds to be submitted through it, so that it can help us not forget half |
54 |
> > of the ebuilds that get submitted. |
55 |
> > |
56 |
> > Karl T |
57 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
58 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
59 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
60 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
61 |
> _______________________________________________ |
62 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
63 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
64 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
65 |
> |
66 |
-- |
67 |
Mikael Hallendal http://micke.hallendal.net/ |
68 |
Stockholm, Sweden Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918 |