Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-crypt/gpa: gpa-0.9.3.ebuild ChangeLog gpa-0.9.1_pre20100416-r1.ebuild
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:38:23
Message-Id: pan.2012.08.28.04.36.59@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-crypt/gpa: gpa-0.9.3.ebuild ChangeLog gpa-0.9.1_pre20100416-r1.ebuild by Rich Freeman
1 Rich Freeman posted on Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:25:53 -0400 as excerpted:
2
3 > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
4 >> [snip]
5
6 > Honestly, while I might agree with that sentiment on some of these
7 > threads, my only complaint with Ciaran's original response was that he
8 > could have been a bit more direct with his concern. Rather than stating
9 > that EXTRA_* does not exist as far as ebuilds go, he could have just
10 > stated that PMS does not allow these variables to be used by an ebuild.
11
12 From here, that looks like a distinction without a difference...
13
14 > Sure, he didn't get into the why, but I'm not sure I'd expect that. I'd
15 > probably state it, but I'm probably the second-most-verbose person on
16 > this list. :)
17
18 =:^)
19
20 (Current off-list context: There's a discussion currently going on,
21 mdraid and lvm2, on scarabeus' "blag", with r0 and I both being rather
22 heavy participants. =:^)
23
24 > If somebody filed a bug against my package and pointed out that
25 > something was illegal per PMS, probably the first thing I'd do is read
26 > it to fully understand the situation, and then if I had a concern I'd
27 > probably ask via irc/private email/etc. That is as much to avoid making
28 > a fool out of myself in public, but also because when somebody who is
29 > obviously knowledgeable points out something they consider a flaw, it
30 > isn't a bad idea to give their concern full consideration.
31
32 Wise words, this and the rest. Thanks.
33
34 FWIW, I believe I've said what I had to say and don't expect to be
35 commenting much further on this, tho of course I reserve the right to
36 change my mind if something drastically provoking comes up. (For I know
37 if I wasn't explicit with that, something /would/ come up. It just works
38 that way...)
39
40 --
41 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
42 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
43 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman