1 |
On Sunday 05 June 2005 21:03, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 |
> 14 files matching the pam prefix and 18 thing matching description. |
3 |
You missed pam_ssh. And that's just an example. |
4 |
By the way... mind telling everyone here how did you do that search? I still |
5 |
feel that looking for pam things in a *single* place is more useful than |
6 |
looking in many different places. |
7 |
|
8 |
If you feel that sys-auth is more logical, seems good to me. I haven't said |
9 |
that it *must* be sys-pam.. was a proposal and as proposal is something I'd |
10 |
like to discuss. |
11 |
|
12 |
> If you really feel you must invalidate everybody else binary trees |
13 |
> and adding a workload on others for your gain then go for it. |
14 |
For my gain? Wait I was talking of me in this case but it's not just me. |
15 |
I think everyone which is looking for pam modules would like to search |
16 |
something like sys-pam, instead of looking here and there on the tree or |
17 |
trying to use some strange black-magic queries. |
18 |
By the way, if you're looking for pam modules, your results are quite full of |
19 |
cruft. |
20 |
|
21 |
> But adding another category for what are clearly mostly system |
22 |
> libraries does not make sense me in this case. |
23 |
Currently sys-libs contains a very wide range of things, just a couple of them |
24 |
seems to be strictly related. As I said, if you feel sys-auth is better, |
25 |
good. That would probably take also other things like courier-authlib for |
26 |
example. |
27 |
But sys-libs doesn't seem the right place for me. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
31 |
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64) |
32 |
|
33 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |