| 1 |
On Wed, 17 May 2006 20:56:14 +0000 |
| 2 |
plasmaroo@g.o (Tim Yamin) wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Well, if you're going to have a package manager that delivers the |
| 5 |
> same result as Portage it must therefore work with Catalyst... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Paludis can produce the same end result as Portage. The reason it won't |
| 8 |
work with catalyst is that the interface is different. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Once again, this is going far beyond the scope of the initial |
| 11 |
discussion. I'm not saying that Paludis should replace Portage, nor |
| 12 |
that it should be an "officially supported package manager". The |
| 13 |
question is simply one of whether I can add a top-level paludis profile |
| 14 |
without people complaining overmuch, or whether I have to go through |
| 15 |
the arch teams and make sub-profiles in 4 different places under |
| 16 |
default-linux/. |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives