| 1 |
On Thursday 26 August 2004 17:04, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Personally I prefer my original wording: |
| 3 |
> > Arch teams: when moving from ~arch to arch on an actively maintained |
| 4 |
> > package where you're going ahead of the maintainer's arch, it's best |
| 5 |
> > to consult first. You don't necessarily have to follow the |
| 6 |
> > maintainer's advice, but at least listen to what they have to say. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The problem is still the same: Other arch maintainers can't know, which arch |
| 9 |
is the package maintainers arch. I would always deny or mask it stable on my |
| 10 |
arch as well, if I had no objections. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Carsten |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives