1 |
On Monday 03 April 2006 18:41, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > dont get me wrong, i hate documenting common sense as much as the next |
4 |
> > sane guy, but it seems Gentoo has come to the point where this needs to |
5 |
> > be done |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > many thanks to the Ubuntu guys and to solar for doing the real work here: |
8 |
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/xml/conduct.html |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > i dont see how anyone can be against this (unless you're a terrorist!), |
11 |
> > so this is on track to be integrated as-is into the dev handbook |
12 |
> > Etiquette section |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I already happen to know a very large number of people are against this |
15 |
> as worded, including myself. If you don't believe me, simply look back |
16 |
> at the thread discussing Ciaran's access revocation by infra. Lots of |
17 |
> people didn't like that very much. Forcing the same bullshit into |
18 |
> policy doesn't change the fact that it is wrong, it merely provides a |
19 |
> way for infra to blow off criticism by saying "RTFM" in the future in |
20 |
> case such an event happens again. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> The simple fact is, until devrel has decided somebody has done something |
23 |
> wrong, such pre-emptive strikes against developers are wrong as far as I |
24 |
> am concerned. |
25 |
|
26 |
please consider the document without the last two paragraphs as they do not |
27 |
belong in it |
28 |
|
29 |
devrel/infra interaction is covered/agreed upon elsewhere |
30 |
|
31 |
my bad |
32 |
-mike |
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |