From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | ||
Date: | Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:22:31 | ||
Message-Id: | 20050810141945.719c41b3@snowdrop.home | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too by Michael Cummings |
1 | On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:10:39 -0400 Michael Cummings |
2 | <mcummings@g.o> wrote: |
3 | | (not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox |
4 | | to reply :) That's great and all that its in features for the |
5 | | installation, but what about packages with optional dependencies based |
6 | | on doc and man? |
7 | |
8 | Join in the quest to get FEATURES added to the expand list! Bug #82513. |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
12 | Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
13 | Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> |