Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | dsd@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:14:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20050810091039.09f46339@sys947.dtic.mil | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too by Daniel Drake |
||
| 1 | (not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox |
| 2 | to reply :) That's great and all that its in features for the |
| 3 | installation, but what about packages with optional dependencies based |
| 4 | on doc and man? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:20:04 +0100 |
| 8 | Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 | > FEATURES="noman" ? |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > Daniel |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> |