Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:19:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200508100916.42340.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too by Michael Cummings |
||
| 1 | On Wednesday 10 August 2005 09:10 am, Michael Cummings wrote: |
| 2 | > (not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox |
| 3 | > to reply :) That's great and all that its in features for the |
| 4 | > installation, but what about packages with optional dependencies based |
| 5 | > on doc and man? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | in that case we're screwed because there are plans to make people use |
| 8 | INSTALL_MASK and drop the FEATURES no{man,doc,info} |
| 9 | -mike |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] We have "doc" USE flag, why not a "man" USE flag too | "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> |