1 |
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
>> Why is it that this thread has 500 replies, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> 500? Try 34 posts in the fallacies of glep55 thread, total, including |
5 |
> OP, on that thread (not this one, no references header, single post as I |
6 |
> read this). But who's counting? (I wasn't, but just did.) |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> but Mart's maintainer-wanted thread has less than 10? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I counted 23, including OP. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> That's not such a huge difference, made even less (just eyeballing it, |
13 |
> perhaps even flipping the lead) if you count only the posts from Gentoo |
14 |
> devs (yes, that would exclude me, too). |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Never-the-less, it's a point worth considering, statistics or not. But, |
17 |
> I did see indications the council is acting to come to some conclusion on |
18 |
> it, which would put it to rest, finally. They moved on the benchmarks, |
19 |
> which is really the first physical movement on the thing, and seems to me |
20 |
> to signal that they are tiring of the debate and want some concrete |
21 |
> numbers to finally put it to rest, approval or disproval. We'll see. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
My god. This just proves that people are not willing to see the oncoming train. |
25 |
|
26 |
The statistics are irrelevant. Go ahead and count how many posts have |
27 |
been made about GLEP55 and 54 since they were introduced.. Now please |
28 |
compare with how many posts have been made about maintainer-wanted. |
29 |
Then perhaps you will see what I mean by "useless talk". |
30 |
|
31 |
This stuff does not need to be resolved, put to rest, approved, |
32 |
disapproved, or whatever! It needs to be kicked out till we can get |
33 |
*BASIC* stuff fixed. |
34 |
|
35 |
You don't fuss about the type of faucets in the bathroom when the roof |
36 |
is falling apart do you? |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |