| 1 |
Hi William, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 5/12/20 4:38 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
> Hi Samuel, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> this change will apply to all users of the eclass. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Also, keepin mind that there was a qa warning in place for this issue |
| 11 |
> for 3 months, so overlay owners should have been able to see that and |
| 12 |
> migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM. |
| 13 |
Yes, I confirm that I'm aware of that. Thank you for your good work! |
| 14 |
> That being said, if any overlay owner would like my assistance with |
| 15 |
> migrating their ebuilds, I have no problem with showing them how. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
No problem from my side, I have already do that. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
My concern was about the others, for instance go-overlay that I have |
| 20 |
enabled. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Should it be possible to run a QA check to create a bug request to |
| 23 |
remember the update of those ebuilds in the overlays? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
This would reduce the bug management task when searching for related bugs. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> Thanks, |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> William |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Thanks, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Samuel |
Archives