Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:38:53
Message-Id: 20200512153847.GB8790@linux1.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass by Samuel Bernardo
1 On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
2 > Hi William,
3 >
4 > How about overlays using the eclass, will this changes only apply to EAPI 8?
5
6 Hi Samuel,
7
8 this change will apply to all users of the eclass.
9
10 Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work.
11
12 Also, keepin mind that there was a qa warning in place for this issue
13 for 3 months, so overlay owners should have been able to see that and
14 migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.
15
16 That being said, if any overlay owner would like my assistance with
17 migrating their ebuilds, I have no problem with showing them how.
18
19 Thanks,
20
21 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.mail@×××××.com>