| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> > Hash: SHA512 |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> I don't see how this is dishonest. |
| 8 |
> > You answered this yourself, |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> >> They'll just be credited side-by-side with everybody else in once |
| 11 |
> >> place. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> How is this dishonest? I see how it is less granular in one |
| 14 |
> particular format. All the current OpenRC authors will be credited. |
| 15 |
> The granular details of their contributions will still be present in |
| 16 |
> git, even if it is hard to access. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I spoke with Roy, and he has only asked that we keep the attribution in |
| 19 |
the binary form the same as it currently is on the master branch, and he |
| 20 |
has asked that I show him the commit that makes the change before it |
| 21 |
hits the master branch. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
There is no intent to be dishonest, just consolidating attributions. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
William |
Archives