| 1 |
On Thursday 08 July 2004 23:13, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> i pushed the 1.10 stuff to stable for ppc/sparc/hppa ... |
| 3 |
> why ? because i gave it a quick & dirty test on my ppc/sparc/hppa boxes |
| 4 |
> and, per our conversation and your [Stuart's] blessing from earlier, marked |
| 5 |
> it stable: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> 13:25 <@vapier> Stuart: you mind if i push the other archs to stable for |
| 8 |
> webapp-config-1.9 ? |
| 9 |
> 13:25 <@Stuart> vapier: I'm happy to push 1.10-r2 stable tbh |
| 10 |
> 13:27 <@vapier> ok Stuart |
| 11 |
> 13:28 <@vapier> i'll mark it stable on the archs i test then ? |
| 12 |
> 13:29 <@Stuart> vapier: please - that'd be a great help |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That was before a number of important problems were found. That's why I never |
| 15 |
marked it stable myself. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> if there was a mis-interpretation here that you really wanted 1.9 marked |
| 18 |
> stable instead of 1.10, then my mistake ... i'll go ahead and 'fix' the |
| 19 |
> KEYWORDing for ppc/sparc/hppa |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Nope. I didn't ask you to wait until I'd actually marked it stable first. I |
| 22 |
should have done. I've done that now. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
webapp-config-1.10-r5 will be in Portage in a few minutes. I've not had any |
| 25 |
problems reported against -r4. Hopefully I'll be able to file a bug to get |
| 26 |
-r5 marked stable on all architectures before the end of the week. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Stu |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 32 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 33 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 36 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 37 |
-- |
Archives