1 |
On Thursday 08 July 2004 03:48 am, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 07 July 2004 19:25, Jason Wever wrote: |
3 |
> I hate to breathe new life into this debate, but I have a request for the |
4 |
> arch teams. This is in direct response to an issue that happened this |
5 |
> week. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Please do not mark webapp-config, or any web-based app, as stable unless it |
8 |
> has been marked stable on the package maintainer's architecture. |
9 |
|
10 |
i pushed the 1.10 stuff to stable for ppc/sparc/hppa ... |
11 |
why ? because i gave it a quick & dirty test on my ppc/sparc/hppa boxes and, |
12 |
per our conversation and your [Stuart's] blessing from earlier, marked it |
13 |
stable: |
14 |
|
15 |
13:25 <@vapier> Stuart: you mind if i push the other archs to stable for |
16 |
webapp-config-1.9 ? |
17 |
13:25 <@Stuart> vapier: I'm happy to push 1.10-r2 stable tbh |
18 |
13:27 <@vapier> ok Stuart |
19 |
13:28 <@vapier> i'll mark it stable on the archs i test then ? |
20 |
13:29 <@Stuart> vapier: please - that'd be a great help |
21 |
|
22 |
if there was a mis-interpretation here that you really wanted 1.9 marked |
23 |
stable instead of 1.10, then my mistake ... i'll go ahead and 'fix' the |
24 |
KEYWORDing for ppc/sparc/hppa |
25 |
-mike |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |