| 1 |
On Sunday 08 November 2009 14:46:34 Thomas Sachau wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger schrieb: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет: |
| 6 |
> >>>> And because I'm a lazy |
| 7 |
> >>>> |
| 8 |
> >>>> I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just |
| 9 |
> >>>> fix it instead |
| 10 |
> >>> |
| 11 |
> >>> Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your |
| 12 |
> >>> responsibility? Sorry but it's your job. |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> >> I make things work. Cosmetics are quite low on my list of priorities. |
| 15 |
> >> Feel free to fix such things. |
| 16 |
> >> All "my" packages are free for all to bump, fix and extend, as long as |
| 17 |
> >> whoever touched it is willing to fix any issues that happen from it. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > using this definition of "correct" (the package installs w/out failure |
| 20 |
> > and it seems to work), there is a lot of crap that could be in the tree. |
| 21 |
> > that doesnt mean the ebuild should be in the tree. this kind of work and |
| 22 |
> > opinion belongs in sunrise, not the main tree. we dont have a QA team to |
| 23 |
> > fix installed packages; they're here to maintain the *quality* of the |
| 24 |
> > tree. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Please stop such comments. Sunrise really isnt a place, where you can drop |
| 27 |
> anything in without any quality check. Join the sunrise team, do our work |
| 28 |
> for some months, then tell me, where it lacks quality checks or anything |
| 29 |
> else. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
you misinterpreted my post. sunrise has built in processes to get the quality |
| 32 |
up past crap. |
| 33 |
-mike |
Archives