1 |
On Monday 15 August 2005 04:19 pm, Stefan Jones wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 15:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > > But first I have an idea to only use scanelf (but that may have issues |
4 |
> > > with 32/64 combined userspaces) which I would want to implement. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > no, it doesnt ... scanelf can handle any ELF format regardless of |
7 |
> > endian/bitsize of the host or target or any combo thereof |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > you can scan 32bit MSB ARM ELF's from a host 64bit LSB X86_64 host just |
10 |
> > as easily as say from a 32bit MSB PARISC host |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Sorry, was not clear enough, a 32bit library cannot resolve a 64bit |
13 |
> dependency. So when you read in the available libraries and there |
14 |
> dependencies you need to keep track of which type they are. |
15 |
|
16 |
i debated adding a flag for that once and ended up with a 'not now, but maybe |
17 |
someday' |
18 |
|
19 |
> Anyway, the -i flag to scanelf fixes that and other issues, just group |
20 |
> all the data from scanelf by interpreter (so have multiple hashes, one |
21 |
> for each interp). |
22 |
|
23 |
yeah, that might be a better idea anyways ... after all, we dont want to limit |
24 |
our concept of different co-existing ABI's to just 32bit/64bit |
25 |
|
26 |
also, you may want to use -F to control the output rather relying on the |
27 |
default output order |
28 |
-mike |
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |