| 1 |
Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 05 September 2004 15:00, John Davis wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>Recent [1] announcements [2] from other large projects have prompted |
| 5 |
>>this inquiry - should Gentoo adopt similar policies regarding Sender ID |
| 6 |
>>and make a public statement or is it not worth our time? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> One of the things that I like about gentoo is the lack of deep politics. If |
| 10 |
> someone is willing to maintain ebuild for packages that support sender id |
| 11 |
> then why shouldn't gentoo host them? We already have stuff like vmware that |
| 12 |
> is both patented and proprietary binary-only software. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Not that anything like this hasn't been done before (e.g. xorg-x11 |
| 16 |
replacing xfree soon). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Steve |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives