Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 49 - take 2
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:12:32
Message-Id: 20060522160705.GA9900@nightcrawler
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 49 - take 2 by "Stephen P. Becker"
1 On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:54:25AM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
2 > > Am I missing something obvious?
3 > >
4 > > -g2boojum-
5 >
6 > Probably just the blatant Ciaran hate, and the realization that people
7 > will have to suck it up and deal with him if his package manager ever
8 > becomes official for Gentoo. Who was it that mentioned this GLEP
9 > stacked the desk against Paludis?
10
11 Might surprise you, but most of those restrictions actually affect
12 *more* then just paludis.
13
14 Pkgcore is external, and will be making a run for official also-
15 granted, easier to just state "you're just trying to screw with
16 ciaranm" to disprove it (rather then arguing the points).
17
18 So... yeah, two sides to it, paludis ain't the only one, don't do the
19 flamebait bit please.
20 ~harring

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 49 - take 2 "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o>