| 1 |
Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:54:25AM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> Am I missing something obvious? |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> -g2boojum- |
| 6 |
>> Probably just the blatant Ciaran hate, and the realization that people |
| 7 |
>> will have to suck it up and deal with him if his package manager ever |
| 8 |
>> becomes official for Gentoo. Who was it that mentioned this GLEP |
| 9 |
>> stacked the desk against Paludis? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Might surprise you, but most of those restrictions actually affect |
| 12 |
> *more* then just paludis. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'm perfectly aware. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Pkgcore is external, and will be making a run for official also- |
| 18 |
> granted, easier to just state "you're just trying to screw with |
| 19 |
> ciaranm" to disprove it (rather then arguing the points). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Arguing the points aren't the issue. I just have a strong suspicion |
| 22 |
that the official requirement is an anti-Ciaranm measure, particularly |
| 23 |
considering that there is a huge contingent of people who would rather |
| 24 |
die in a fire than let him back onto the developer team in order to make |
| 25 |
paludis official. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I don't foresee the same issue with you and pkgcore, since these same |
| 28 |
folks would likely be glad to take you back in in order to make it an |
| 29 |
official gentoo project. You only left the project initially *because* |
| 30 |
of Ciaran, you weren't kicked out. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> So... yeah, two sides to it, paludis ain't the only one, don't do the |
| 34 |
> flamebait bit please. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Just don't pretend that what I have stated isn't an issue. Otherwise, |
| 37 |
you are being naive (or pretending). |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-Steve |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives