1 |
John Mylchreest wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> No objections here. I've been waiting fort his move for a little while |
4 |
> now. The only real problems will be with those 2.4 (devfs) users who |
5 |
> refuse to move, maybe this is good enough incentive. |
6 |
|
7 |
Just to make sure on a few things, we're talking x86 users here being the |
8 |
hardcore 2.4 types, right? |
9 |
|
10 |
While I'm all for 2.6, mips-side, we've still got some issues on IP22 |
11 |
(Indy/Indigo2) systems that forces me to keep a 2.4.31 ebuild around. Sparc is |
12 |
also in a similar, although much bigger boat, where a whole lot of 2.6.x |
13 |
releases just don't work for various systems, thus they have to stick with 2.4.x |
14 |
as well. |
15 |
|
16 |
Any of these changes that may affect 2.4/devfs usage need to keep this in mind |
17 |
that some of us who still use 2.4/devfs may not be doing so out of choice, |
18 |
simply because it's the only option we have. |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
--Kumba |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead |
25 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
26 |
|
27 |
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands |
28 |
do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond |
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |