Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing /srv into Gentoo Linux
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 02:05:54
Message-Id: 1075860342.2802.25.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing /srv into Gentoo Linux by Jon Portnoy
1 On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 20:37, Jon Portnoy wrote:
2 > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:20:45AM +0000, Stuart Herbert wrote:
3 > Content-Description: signed data
4 > > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 1:12 am, Jon Portnoy wrote:
5 > > > I think the FHS needs to stop wrecking a perfectly usable preexisting
6 > > > standard filesystem layout by introducing useless directories like
7 > > > /media (should be under /mnt) and /srv (should be under /var).
8 > >
9 > > I'm with you on /media. But I think /srv has merit.
10 >
11 > What does /srv give us that /var doesn't?
12
13 It's worth reading the reasoning for its existence:
14
15 http://bugs.freestandards.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing /srv into Gentoo Linux Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>