Archives
Archives
| From: | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing /srv into Gentoo Linux | ||
| Date: | Wed, 04 Feb 2004 01:37:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040204013730.GA11825@cerberus.oppresses.us | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing /srv into Gentoo Linux by Stuart Herbert |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:20:45AM +0000, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 | Content-Description: signed data |
| 3 | > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 1:12 am, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 4 | > > I think the FHS needs to stop wrecking a perfectly usable preexisting |
| 5 | > > standard filesystem layout by introducing useless directories like |
| 6 | > > /media (should be under /mnt) and /srv (should be under /var). |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > I'm with you on /media. But I think /srv has merit. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | What does /srv give us that /var doesn't? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Jon Portnoy |
| 14 | avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing /srv into Gentoo Linux | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing /srv into Gentoo Linux | Christian Birchinger <joker@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing /srv into Gentoo Linux | Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> |