1 |
On 04/10/2012 07:28 PM, Steven J Long wrote: |
2 |
> I suppose you could script that, but again, it just seems like a lot of |
3 |
> bother to implement an "alternative" that doesn't actually gain anything |
4 |
> over the traditional setup (plus making sure that partitions are mounted |
5 |
> before udev starts.) |
6 |
|
7 |
At least in the case of udev, we gain from not having to maintain a fork. |
8 |
|
9 |
> As for the burden of ensuring that binaries installed to /{s,}bin don't link |
10 |
> to libs in /usr, why not just automate a QA check for that, and let |
11 |
> developers decide whether a fix is necessary? After all, core packages that |
12 |
> do that even when configured with prefix and execprefix = /, aren't so |
13 |
> portable, and Gentoo has always championed "doing the right thing" wrt |
14 |
> helping upstream fix portability issues. |
15 |
|
16 |
If the relevant ebuild developers really want to support that, it's fine |
17 |
I guess. Hopefully that won't involve using static links as workarounds |
18 |
for cross-/usr dependencies. |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Thanks, |
21 |
Zac |