Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

[Ciaran McCreesh]

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:18:33 +0000 Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com>
wrote:
| Would make a very nice QA measure. Any outdated/broken ebuild could be
| auto reported to bugzilla and removed in 72 hours if no responce.

Eh? Huh? By "QA measure" you mean "ways of making loads of QA problems"?

| I think gentoo really needs QA measures of this sort. Like in debian,
| packages get moved up from unstable to testing automatically if no
| critical reports were made for 2 weeks.

We've already discussed over and over why we can't do this. It would be
a QA nightmare.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm