1 |
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 19:55, Jan Krueger wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 07 September 2003 13:12, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
3 |
> > That, with the fact that changing this way of doing things, will break |
4 |
> > the 'should sorda work out of the box' policy that we support (or try |
5 |
> > to last time I checked). |
6 |
> Thats good policy and will work for most (Desktops). |
7 |
> Windows does it, even for servers, and it works pretty well, especially for |
8 |
> lovesan. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
I did say 'sorda'. Mostly it is just a fairly usable skeleton. |
12 |
|
13 |
> On Sunday 07 September 2003 13:12, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
14 |
> > [...] work out of the box' |
15 |
> Thats an illusion if gentoo-core would like to enter the serious server |
16 |
> market. There is no such thing as 'out of the box'. |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
Once again, refer to top. |
20 |
|
21 |
> Taken from http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/about.xml: |
22 |
> "Thanks to a technology called Portage, Gentoo Linux can become an ideal |
23 |
> secure server" |
24 |
> |
25 |
> is not really true. portage, beside the terrible security holes like |
26 |
> "pkg_postinst", has, up to now, nothing to do with the security of a server. |
27 |
> Please clearify the statement on the page. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
Example since you keep bringing it up, and if possible how you would |
31 |
resolve it. Also, anything that might be harmful, could also be done |
32 |
in src_install/where ever. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
|
37 |
Martin Schlemmer |
38 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
39 |
Cape Town, South Africa |