Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jan Krueger <jk@×××××××××××.net>
To: azarah@g.o
Cc: Troy Dack <tad@g.o>, Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 15:50:30
Message-Id: 200309071755.57773.jk@microgalaxy.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions by Martin Schlemmer
1 On Sunday 07 September 2003 13:12, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
2 > That, with the fact that changing this way of doing things, will break
3 > the 'should sorda work out of the box' policy that we support (or try
4 > to last time I checked).
5 Thats good policy and will work for most (Desktops).
6 Windows does it, even for servers, and it works pretty well, especially for
7 lovesan.
8
9 On Sunday 07 September 2003 13:12, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
10 > [...] work out of the box'
11 Thats an illusion if gentoo-core would like to enter the serious server
12 market. There is no such thing as 'out of the box'.
13
14 Taken from http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/about.xml:
15 "Thanks to a technology called Portage, Gentoo Linux can become an ideal
16 secure server"
17
18 is not really true. portage, beside the terrible security holes like
19 "pkg_postinst", has, up to now, nothing to do with the security of a server.
20 Please clearify the statement on the page.
21
22 Jan
23
24
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Some suggestions Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>