Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, dlan@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 21:17:15
Message-Id: 201602012216.54035.dilfridge@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!] by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 Am Montag, 1. Februar 2016, 21:30:41 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
5 > On 01 Feb 2016 19:55, Patrice Clement wrote:
6 > > > New issues:
7 > > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/780f65b/output.html#dev-> > > libs/efl
8 > >
9 > > This commit is breaking the tree:
10 > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=97a6aec
11 > >
12 > > I did try to work around the issue you've introduced when but the
13 > > enlightenment eclasses are a bit of mystery to me and I eventually gave
14 > > up.
15 > >
16 > > Could you revert this commit and fix this issue?
17 >
18 > the issue is that efl-1.15.2 is marked stable for alpha/ia64/sparc, and
19 > it depends on app-i18n/ibus, but commit 97a6aec deleted the only ibus
20 > ebuild that was marked stable for those arches.
21 >
22 > it can be fixed in a few ways (i'm listing in order of preference):
23 > (1) mark a newer ibus stable
24 > (2) revert that commit to re-add the old stable ebuilds
25 > (3) add USE=ibus to package.use.stable.mask for these arches
26 > (4) degrade all packages for these arches to unstable
27 > -mike
28
29 I took the liberty of doing (2) and reverted the commit. Not sure why this
30 needs so much discussion; after all a broken tree is always suboptimal.
31
32 Now there's lots of time to come up with a better solution.
33
34
35 - --
36
37 Andreas K. Huettel
38 Gentoo Linux developer
39 dilfridge@g.o
40 http://www.akhuettel.de/
41
42 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
43 Version: GnuPG v2.1
44
45 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWr8tFXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
46 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRDMjhGQ0IwRjdCRUQxMzdBQUNCMDJEODlB
47 NDRDRjM3M0U3RUU5OUU0AAoJEKRM83Pn7pnk2RcP/jQFF5qb1Cftus7TRXQ71xsm
48 xJh6cpmivsVYv0c1I1edtAyMCObWJ+Fs75nlQIRTx/hB3oFdEmLtzmdj9riPQ62M
49 2y3yWiGSCyey07AieIQlaOREbuBe7lBiXM0VwFAzEc2YACvaL7L/oMF/TeKVs/mD
50 TI31OZYztuR7/1RBevF5q+occx+mboDouMJqHEn/3dr0zVY8mo480T0CNZxsXJhT
51 A+zNPXa9rKM6EPcqKR41QBWXXy8rGn4gt7+zPwLc7jVZaWmNBpRWwaX95kQYkyiT
52 P1qYOhpsC/QMA89pGwBwC4fRVEsarX1tYaxjr6rjzQb8jTrjAeqN+ieZhg7VWxBq
53 +icdhwHodTtB7XepWOdGeuO+ykc+a8syShUi++8GxhOM4R42u+8j12+wGRgOcyaW
54 Yf9OFm4riM6LN24Fw2LdGYkyVVIR2OeG5j+ABxXFcivTSc99fxc0MywlMhACzdqg
55 a56nyGPekCeiGIdIno6yfC98aItGLGVFwU1XhcTC2FXBsOKA9nrs9ZYMKHzraqU/
56 d0G9wCz9TiRgdbuzakuHYK1MrxOnWBLpXmfdaVGf0llIquQ8phLgZbvITkMc8Q+W
57 xMH7Dt9plBud0OlK/VNy/SC+F/nTX9VqbEnk0gZ5h+OMebJ1olaF1e7Lk6Rlgkp3
58 Xvxps+yqU6pDuSQoxEkU
59 =S77D
60 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies