1 |
On Thursday 01 of January 2009 22:03:55 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> No, FHS is not the most commonly used layout. The traditional Unix |
3 |
> layout is the most commonly used layout. |
4 |
|
5 |
So.. why not blindly use Unix layout everywhere instead (for Gentoo news as |
6 |
well) |
7 |
|
8 |
On Thursday 01 of January 2009 22:37:28 Alistair Bush wrote: |
9 |
> I actually agreed with Ciaran on this point. especially seeing I would |
10 |
> like us to follow the parts of LSB that make sense within the Gentoo |
11 |
> ecosystem. (take Init Script Actions as an possible example |
12 |
> http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-ge |
13 |
>neric/iniscrptact.html). |
14 |
|
15 |
So, you agree with Mr Ciaran on that FHS is silly or on blindly following |
16 |
*every* LSB standard being silly? Great, but I wasn't suggesting any of this, |
17 |
I just suggested to pick any standard (most commonly used in Gentoo already), |
18 |
and *only one* and blindly follow it to avoid inconsistency. |
19 |
In such scenario, please elaborate what is your point really. |
20 |
|
21 |
>> It's not the point to blindly follow freedesktop or LSB - the point is to |
22 |
>> consistently follow one standard across whole distribution - if it's FHS |
23 |
>> - fine, if not - fine as well - but *only one* at a time. |
24 |
> > That being said I'd rather propose to force Gentoo news to comply to |
25 |
>> FHS as FHS is the most commonly used file/directory layout in Gentoo. |
26 |
|
27 |
> This really is bikeshedding...... Isn't consistently following a |
28 |
> standard also blindly following it. So when you ask us to consistently |
29 |
> follow FHS why not ask for us to blindly follow it. |
30 |
> Man this is getting boring. |
31 |
|
32 |
Yes, you're right. Let everyone follow his own standards - everyone likes |
33 |
spaghetti afterall... (just look at eclasses/ebuilds in you're uncertain) |
34 |
|
35 |
No, it's not bikeshedding, it's misunderstanding the sentence. |
36 |
Consistently following *some* standard is blindly following *the same* |
37 |
standard, but consistently following *some standard* is *not* blindly |
38 |
following LSB nor is blindly following FHS. See the difference? |
39 |
|
40 |
So to make it all clear once again and for the last time - I would rather |
41 |
propose to force Gentoo news to comply to existing the most commonly used |
42 |
file/directory hierarchy structure in Gentoo distribution. |
43 |
|
44 |
cheers |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
regards |
48 |
MM |