Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on crazy things in EXTRA_ECONF?
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:15:14
Message-Id: 200411291015.02293.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Policy on crazy things in EXTRA_ECONF? by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Thursday 25 November 2004 06:38 pm, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > 1. Should users _expect_ their system to work completely when they pass
3 > in EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-static" to everything? Should packages be made
4 > to support this, or would most people here consider that as invalid.
5 > (see bug #72186).
6
7 i'm of the opinion that if they break it, it's not our problem to put the
8 pieces back together
9
10 > Alternatively, should we strip certain things out of
11 > EXTRA_ECONF on a per-ebuild basis?
12
13 i dont think so
14 -mike
15
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list