| 1 |
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 00:50, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well, not directly related to this issue, but related to gcc. So I'll reply to |
| 3 |
> this thread in the hope of catching attention of all parties touching gcc |
| 4 |
> ebuilds. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Please, do not add "ada" to gcc_lang definition in ebuilds, as per #25178! |
| 7 |
> This is getting rediculous - the moment I clean-up ebuilds I see "ada" popping |
| 8 |
> in in a newer version :). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
[ bla blah bla blah ] |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
:) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Sorry, forgot, and I am pretty sure whoever did not fix it for gcc-3.3.1 |
| 15 |
back then (and the bigger reason why I missed it). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Anyhow, thanks for catching it! |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Thanks, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 26 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives