| 1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Michael Palimaka wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 28/12/16 20:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we |
| 5 |
>> are trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't |
| 6 |
>> define the term [2]. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be |
| 9 |
> stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both |
| 10 |
> components. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
PMS uses "package dependency specification", but that may be too long |
| 13 |
for the name of the field. How about "ebuilds to stabilise"? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Ulrich |
Archives