From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users | ||
Date: | Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:52:10 | ||
Message-Id: | 22102.843.697962.119455@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users by William Hubbs |
1 | >>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > From what I've read, the traditional difference between bin and sbin |
4 | > was that sbin means static-bin and everything stored in there was to |
5 | > be able to come up without libraries. |
6 | |
7 | Source/reference for this? |
8 | |
9 | > As mgorny was talking about earlier, a good chunk of what is in sbin |
10 | > *can* be run by normal users. |
11 | |
12 | Then it shouldn't be in sbin, in the first place. That's a separate |
13 | discussion though. |
14 | |
15 | Ulrich |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users | splite-gentoo@××××××××××××××××.edu |