| 1 |
Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 3 |
>> First I'd like to state that I do offer my opinion. You don't have to like it, |
| 4 |
>> but disqualifying it as flaming, while exactly doing this yourself, |
| 5 |
>> disqualifies you. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> *cough*. bit hypocritical for you to lecture me about viewing |
| 8 |
> your statements as 'flaming', and in the same breath label |
| 9 |
> my own as 'flaming' ;) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Why am I pointing this out? My initial points were that of "why the |
| 12 |
> double standard", with you providing an apt example (while that's |
| 13 |
> barbed, you did provide a perfect refresher of the definition). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> I'd appreciate, if you would try to have a controversial |
| 17 |
>> discussion, without starting to loose your manners. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> And I'd appreciate a less condescending tone. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Can you two please stop with this child-like circle of blame? Its really |
| 22 |
starting to get old. You don't need to have the last word on every |
| 23 |
argument (either of you). If neither of you can agree, then just agree |
| 24 |
to disagree. *gasp* Yes, that is an option in a technical debate. No |
| 25 |
matter what either of you two think is technically right, you're both |
| 26 |
right and both wrong. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
/me goes back to lurking |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 32 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
--- |
| 35 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 36 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
Archives