| 1 |
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 02:10:04 +0200 Sven Köhler <skoehler@×××.de> wrote:
|
| 2 |
| After the all, the whole mess can IMHO only be cleared up, if there's
|
| 3 |
| something like a universal terminal-type, and the application could
|
| 4 |
| ask the terminal for it's feature-set. So i'm not aware if this is
|
| 5 |
| possible, but this seems to be the only _really_ reliable extensible
|
| 6 |
| way to do this. I don't see the point in define lots of all new
|
| 7 |
| terminal-types.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
There is none. Even if such a thing existed, it wouldn't solve the
|
| 10 |
"does this terminal have any weird bugs" issue.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
--
|
| 13 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
|
| 14 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
|
| 15 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives