| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:08:23 +0900 |
| 3 |
Jason Stubbs <jasonbstubbs@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> However, checking /etc/make.profile/packages, I find that nano has in |
| 7 |
> fact been removed. In fact, there isn't any editor listed as part of |
| 8 |
> the base system. Is this correct? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Nope. thats incorrect. : |
| 12 |
*virtual/editor |
| 13 |
is listed in packages, which will be satisfied by any editor providing |
| 14 |
just that. "editor" |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
and the virtuals file gives: |
| 17 |
virtual/editor app-editors/nano |
| 18 |
that nano is the default editor if no other is installed. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
//Spider |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
begin .signature |
| 25 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 26 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 27 |
end |
Archives