1 |
2012/11/1 Jamie Learmonth <jamie-lists@×××××××××××××.com>: |
2 |
> Firstly, why are you guys always so mad, and secondly why don't we just |
3 |
> start packaging more of these packages as binaries then or bundling the |
4 |
> needed version like the rest of the world does anyways? |
5 |
|
6 |
So are you suggesting to package all the binaries that depend upon too |
7 |
old boost, or upon too new boost, or whatever, as binaries? |
8 |
|
9 |
I always thought those few -bin packages are -bin just because they |
10 |
take quite a lot time to be compiled. |
11 |
|
12 |
> So how about we transform this distro into one where decisions are made on |
13 |
> real world benefits, not purist ideals, and technical giants help each other |
14 |
> to make breakthroughs unimaginable to others because they are smarter, work |
15 |
> together, and the most kick-ass geeks on this interweb. I want to keep using |
16 |
> Gentoo not just because of the pretty colours on the eix output or because |
17 |
> when I run emerge --world in a coffee shop all the chicks think I'm that guy |
18 |
> from the Hackers movie, or even because my favourite color is purple. I want |
19 |
> to keep using Gentoo because the team effing rocks! |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Who's with me? |
22 |
|
23 |
I hope you'd forgive I'd oppose that suggestion, given I'm not a |
24 |
Gentoo dev but just a C++ developer who uses Gentoo as his primary |
25 |
(and, in fact, only) distro and loves it a lot. |
26 |
|
27 |
Gentoo has a wonderful community which I truly love, but first thing |
28 |
about a distro is how it helps you to solve your problems and achieve |
29 |
your goals. I'd surely miss the slotted Boost, since it was one of the |
30 |
things I needed for my C++ thingies and which I loved, but Diego's |
31 |
arguments are sane and reasonable, and I also had quite some PITA with |
32 |
old/new/whatever Boost versions, so OK, I can live without slotted |
33 |
Boost. But please, leave Gentoo as that powerful distro that really |
34 |
helps to work and code. I want it source-based. I want to be able to |
35 |
seamlessly have Qt 4.8.9999, or cabal integrated with Portage (kudos |
36 |
to gentoo-haskell guys, they're doing great work), and things like |
37 |
that. |
38 |
|
39 |
That makes even more sense given the new C++11 standard and it's |
40 |
gradual implementation in gcc. One could just as well say "let's just |
41 |
keep the newest gcc 4.7 in portage, since there is software that fails |
42 |
to build with gcc 4.6 and earlier", for example. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Georg Rudoy |
46 |
LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org |