| 1 |
Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> Since we currently have language herds for other languages such as Ada, |
| 3 |
> Perl, and Java, I don't think C++ should be any different. There are |
| 4 |
> currently many packages in the tree that are C++ libraries or utilities |
| 5 |
> that are no-herd and are actively maintained, and there are probably |
| 6 |
> some that have just been sitting around rotting. With the creation of a |
| 7 |
> C++ herd, there would be a team that could support these packages, |
| 8 |
> instead of a single maintainer, if the package has one. Below is a list |
| 9 |
> of all of the packages that I believe would qualify as falling under |
| 10 |
> this herd. If you see your name in the following list, I'd especially |
| 11 |
> like to hear from you. Names with a '?' next to them are packages that |
| 12 |
> had no metadata and I guessed from the changelog who the maintainer is. |
| 13 |
> I would also like to see many of them, if not all, moved to the dev-cpp |
| 14 |
> category: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
<snip> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm game. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Who's scruffy-looking? |
| 22 |
-- Han Solo |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@g.o> |
| 25 |
[ BSD | commonbox | cron | cvs-utils | mips | netmon | shell-tools | vim ] |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives