1 |
В Вск, 01/05/2011 в 13:44 +0300, Panagiotis Christopoulos пишет: |
2 |
> On 12:06 Sun 01 May , Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
> > So not only they are rather useless, and information you can easily |
4 |
> get |
5 |
> > from sources.gentoo.org, they take your time as well. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Then, let's change it to: |
8 |
> <snip> |
9 |
> "Though not mandatory, it is highly recommended that file removals are |
10 |
> also recorded the same way." |
11 |
> </snip> |
12 |
|
13 |
Panagiotis, there is no use in ChangeLog if information there is not |
14 |
reliable. With policy you suggest one will have to check ChangeLog first |
15 |
and then in half cases go to sources.gentoo.org to find out when ebuild |
16 |
was removed. Two actions instead of one: either look ChangeLog or go to |
17 |
web for cvs history. |
18 |
|
19 |
Also, repoman commit is even slower then echangelog and thus nobody |
20 |
waits for it to finish: just call it in console and switch to other |
21 |
deals then just return back to check. If there are very many commits it |
22 |
possible to script them. The only thing Samuli needs to do is to use |
23 |
ecommit() hook: |
24 |
|
25 |
ecommit() { |
26 |
echangelog "$@" |
27 |
repoman commit -m "$@" |
28 |
} |
29 |
|
30 |
But Samuli knows this very well and Fabian's answer describes situation |
31 |
best. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Peter. |