1 |
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:31:23AM +0100 or thereabouts, Thierry Carrez wrote: |
2 |
> What I find disturbing here is that nobody found the issue interesting |
3 |
> enough to read the October Council decisions as to what was needed to be |
4 |
> changed for the GLEP to be approved. |
5 |
|
6 |
I think there's some validity to this point, but I actually hold the |
7 |
members of the council at least partially repsonsible for the lack of |
8 |
communication. |
9 |
|
10 |
<my opinion> |
11 |
The council is not only responsible for making decisions when consensus |
12 |
cannot be reached. They're also responsible for proactive communication. |
13 |
I don't think it's reasonable to expect all devs to read through full IRC |
14 |
transcripts, sift out the nonsense, distill it down to its salient points |
15 |
and then decide how it fits with their own particular views on Gentoo. |
16 |
|
17 |
The council needs to take a more active role in posting meeting minutes and |
18 |
proactively communicating with the dev community, rather than expecting |
19 |
everyone to come to them to figure out what's going on. |
20 |
</my opinion> |
21 |
|
22 |
> You can't just ignore the discussion and the iterim decisions and |
23 |
> complain afterwards when the decision is taken. |
24 |
|
25 |
You can't reasonably expect all Gentoo devs to read through unfiltered IRC |
26 |
logs to figure out what discussion went on. |
27 |
|
28 |
And, just for the record, s/Gentoo Council/Gentoo Trustees/ and I feel the |
29 |
exact same way -- we, as trustees, need to do a better job about |
30 |
communicating as well. |
31 |
|
32 |
--kurt |